Beta measures how sensitive the portfolio is to market movements, providing a way to quantify systematic risk. Ultimately, the Treynor ratio attempts to measure how successful an investment is in providing compensation to investors for taking on investment risk. The Treynor ratio is reliant upon a portfolio’s beta—that is, the sensitivity of the portfolio’s returns to movements in the market—to judge risk. From the results above, we see that the Treynor Ratio of the Equity Portfolio is slightly higher.
You get a clear view of return per unit of market movement. Avoid using it when your portfolio includes too many isolated or sector-specific assets. It won’t give a full picture if Bitcoin cfd your holdings lack balance. You subtract the risk-free rate from your portfolio return. Then, you divide that result by the portfolio’s beta. The final number shows how much return you get for each unit of market risk.
Copyright: © 2025 Volity Trade Ltd. All Rights reserved.
It shows how much excess return you earn for every unit of market risk. You learned how to calculate it and when to use it. You also saw how it compares to Sharpe, Sortino, and Jensen’s Alpha. Each one gives a different angle on performance. You get the best results when you use them together.
What is the Treynor Ratio?
- In cases where the portfolios have varying total risk and similar systematic risks, they will be ranked the same, making this ratio useless in the performance analysis of such portfolios.
- You miss key details if your portfolio isn’t diversified.
- Excess return in this sense refers to the return earned above the return that could have been earned in a risk-free investment.
- Are you trying to improve your portfolio’s performance?
- All investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
Ultimately, comparing the Treynor ratio of a portfolio to similar investments or benchmarks provides a more accurate gauge of performance. If a portfolio has a negative beta, however, the ratio result is not meaningful. A higher ratio result is more desirable and means that a given portfolio is likely a more suitable investment. This measure is valuable for investors who want to distinguish between managers who generate higher returns through skill rather than simply taking on higher market risk. The Treynor Ratio is a portfolio performance measure that adjusts for systematic risk. In contrast to the Sharpe Ratio, which adjusts return with the standard deviation of the portfolio, the Treynor Ratio uses the Portfolio Beta, which is a measure of systematic risk.
Risk Type
The Sharpe Ratio works better when your portfolio still holds specific stock or sector risk. A ratio above 0.5 often signals strong performance. A value near 1.0 means an excellent risk-return balance. But always compare portfolios with similar market exposure. The Fixed Income portfolio has a higher Treynor ratio, which suggests that this portfolio has a more favorable risk/return mix than the fixed income portfolio. Therefore, it is advisable for an investor to invest in the Fixed Income portfolio.
Key Learning Points
Ratios that use the beta, the Treynor ratio being one of those, could also be best fitted to compare short-term performance. However, what qualifies as a good Treynor ratio can vary depending on market conditions and the investment strategy. For example, in bull markets, higher Treynor ratios are expected, as returns typically exceed risk-free rates by a larger margin. For example, if Portfolio A and Portfolio B both earned 10%, but Portfolio A has a beta of 0.8 and Portfolio B has a beta of 1.2, Portfolio A will likely have a higher Treynor Ratio. This means it achieved similar returns with less market exposure indicating superior risk efficiency. Want to see if you get a fair reward for market risk?
- Instead, the beta should be measured against an index more representative of the large-cap universe, such as the Russell 1000 index.
- Suzanne is a content marketer, writer, and fact-checker.
- Antonio Di Giacomo studied at the Bessières School of Accounting in Paris, France, as well as at the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM).
- There is no one-size-fits-all answer to what is a good Treynor Ratio, as it varies depending on the investor’s risk tolerance and the overall market conditions.
The key difference between the Treynor Ratio and the Sharpe Ratio lies in the type of risk they consider. It’s particularly useful for comparing the performance of different mutual funds or managed portfolios where the focus is on how well managers compensate for market-related risks. Investors also use the Treynor ratio for comparing portfolios with similar beta values.
Treynor Ratio Calculation Example
That makes it great for judging how well your investments react to the market itself. It’s important to note that the Treynor ratio does not provide meaningful values for negative values of beta. Further, though the Treynor ratio can be used to rank investment portfolios, it does not provide information on whether these investment portfolios are superior or better than the market portfolio. A low Treynor Ratio could mean that your portfolio has too much exposure to market risk without enough reward. A high Treynor Ratio suggests that the portfolio is performing well, delivering strong returns relative to the risk taken, which is ideal for long-term investors. Using multiple metrics can provide a more nuanced view of an investment’s performance and risks, allowing you to make more balanced and informed decisions.
The Treynor ratio is a tool in portfolio analysis that helps investors assess how well a portfolio compensates them for taking on market risk, also known as systematic risk. This portfolio ratio shows how much return an investor can expect for each unit of market risk. It offers insight into how efficiently a portfolio’s manager is balancing risk and return and can be useful for comparing portfolios or funds that might have different risk levels. Due to some limitations, it is often used in conjunction with other performance metrics. The Treynor ratio, a part of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), measures a portfolio manager’s returns in excess of the risk-free rate, while also factoring in risk. Basically, this ratio is an investment portfolio performance measure.
Assume that total return on the equity portfolio and fixed income portfolio is 8% and 6% respectively. Moreover, we assume that the beta on the equity portfolio and fixed income portfolio is 1.40 and 0.8 respectively. Using this information, we compute the Treynor ratio for both portfolios. This formula essentially calculates the excess return earned per unit of market risk, providing a clear picture of how well the portfolio has performed relative to its market risk exposure. You must know where the Treynor Ratio falls short.
The Wharton Online & Wall Street Prep Applied Value Investing Certificate Program
It indicates that a portfolio is generating more return for each unit of market risk it has assumed, suggesting a more efficient investment. You should use the Treynor Ratio when your portfolio is already diversified. That means you have already removed unsystematic risk. Treynor focuses only on what you can’t diversify.
It indicates how much return an investment, such as a portfolio of stocks, a mutual fund, or exchange-traded fund, earned for the amount of risk the investment assumed. Even though Fund B earned a higher return, Fund A offers better risk-adjusted performance, as it provided more excess return per unit of market risk. The Treynor Ratio is designed to assess risk-adjusted performance, focusing exclusively on market-related (systematic) risk rather than total volatility. It calculates how much excess return an investment earns over the risk-free rate for each unit of market risk taken.
It works well for portfolios that aim to protect capital. Jensen’s Alpha shows how much return you earn beyond what the CAPM predicts. A positive alpha means your portfolio beats expectations. You use the Treynor Ratio if you manage a benchmarked fund or a market-based strategy.